On top of that, add departmental budget constraints (and the personnel cuts that many companies have seen in recent years) and even reasonable security solutions might seem impossible to attain. Three trends have increased the bite that security takes out of the IT department’s overall budget:
Network security is so pervasive a consideration that even network management consoles raise concerns. As we’ll talk about in Chapter 15, some worry about whether the SNMP infrastructure itself is secure enough. After all, stealing the right SNMP community string would give a hacker a road map to an entire internetwork’s configuration, and unless you’ve been living in a cave, you know about computer viruses spreading in various forms: e-mail bombs, Trojan horse Java applets, Denial-of-Service attacks, and other worrisome new threats to computer security. Suffice it to say that a lot of time, money, and effort go into network security.
In Chapter 9, we’ll talk about Cisco’s Internet access and security products. Just as a head’s up, the focus will be mainly on how firewalls—and even routers—monitor internetwork traffic at the packet level to provide security. Traffic-based security runs on firewalls and routers and deals mainly in IP addresses. But a second kind of security operates at the people level. This kind of security, called user-based security, employs passwords and other login controls to authenticate users’ identities before they are permitted access. There are two basic types of user-based security:
Security is the third major control system in internetworking, along with network management systems and routing protocols. Although the three control systems have distinct missions, you’ll see a familiar pattern:
Figure 8-1 illustrates the common architecture shared by network control systems. Looking at the figure, you see two new names listed next to SNMP—TACACS+ and RADIUS. These are the protocols used for security, not management, as is SNMP, but they’re analogous in how they operate. Data is gathered from network devices and stored
in a central database, and a console is used to configure devices from a central management workstation. Network management and security systems differ in what they do, but are basically the same in how they work. The third internetwork control system, routing protocols, differs sharply. Routing protocols don’t use servers because the information—route tables—is transient and doesn’t need to be stored on disk. Additionally, they don’t use consoles because they are largely self-operating. The structural similarities between network management and security will make it easier to comprehend network security technology. Just swap in new names for protocols (TACACS+and RADIUS) and consoles, and you understand the general setup.
blog comments powered by Disqus |