Practices
  Home arrow Practices arrow Page 3 - Writing A User Manual (part 2)
Dev Shed Forums 
Administration  
AJAX  
Apache  
BrainDump  
DHTML  
Flash  
Java  
JavaScript  
Multimedia  
MySQL  
Oracle  
Perl  
PHP  
Practices  
Python  
Reviews  
Security  
Style-Sheets  
Web Services  
XML  
Zend  
Zope  
Forums Sitemap 
IBM® developerWorks 
Sun Developer Network 
Dedicated Servers 
E-Commerce Hosting 
Linux Web Hosting 
Managed Hosting 
Small Business Hosting 
Moblin 
JMSL Numerical Library 
VPS Hosting 
Weekly Newsletter

 
Developer Updates  
Free Website Content 
 RSS  Articles
 RSS  Forums
 RSS  All Feeds
Write For Us Get Paid 
Request Media Kit
Contact Us 
Site Map 
Privacy Policy 
Support 
 USERNAME
 
 PASSWORD
 
 
  >>> SIGN UP!  
  Lost Password? 
PRACTICES

Writing A User Manual (part 2)
By: Deepa L, (c) Melonfire
  • Search For More Articles!
  • Disclaimer
  • Author Terms
  • Rating: 5 stars5 stars5 stars5 stars5 stars / 10
    2003-01-03

    Table of Contents:
  • Writing A User Manual (part 2)
  • Looking For Improvement
  • Cheat Sheet
  • Version Control
  • Putting The Package Together

  • Rate this Article: Poor Best 
      ADD THIS ARTICLE TO:
      Del.ici.ous Digg
      Blink Simpy
      Google Spurl
      Y! MyWeb Furl
    Email Me Similar Content When Posted
    Add Developer Shed Article Feed To Your Site
    Email Article To Friend
    Print Version Of Article
    PDF Version Of Article
     
     
    ADVERTISEMENT


    Writing A User Manual (part 2) - Cheat Sheet


    (Page 3 of 5 )

    A thorough review needs a lot of commitment and time. You will need to make it easier for your reviewers by including quick cheat sheets stating what they should be looking for. An example cheat sheet for the SMEs would be:
    1. A technical review is not an editorial review.
    2. Focus on the technical facts to verify that the technology works as documented.
    3. Verify the technical accuracy of all procedural steps included in the document.
    4. Verify the technical accuracy of all screen captures in the document.
    User reviews are a tad trickier than the others are because of the lack of resources. First, you may not have access to the actual users to review your document. And second, they may not really be motivated at that point to take the time to review your document. The workaround is to use your marketing and QA departments, and perhaps the people from the customer's end who are involved in the project.

    Once the reviews are in, you need to get down to implementing the changes suggested. One tip would be to start revision on a document only after all the review comments are in. Also, while we won't get into the art of accepting feedback, you have to be in control of the changes that you agree to make. While you can change the information quite a bit at the time of the first review, you should try and restrict your changes to corrections only after the second review; structural changes this late in the process will throw you off.

    More Practices Articles
    More By Deepa L, (c) Melonfire


     

       

    PRACTICES ARTICLES

    - More Techniques for Finding Things
    - Finding Things
    - Finishing the System`s Outlines
    - The System in So Many Words
    - Basic Data Types and Calculations
    - What`s the Address? Pointers
    - Design with ArgoUML
    - Pragmatic Guidelines: Diagrams That Work
    - Five-Step UML: OOAD for Short Attention Span...
    - Five-Step UML: OOAD for Short Attention Span...
    - Introducing UML: Object-Oriented Analysis an...
    - Class and Object Diagrams
    - Class Relationships
    - Classes
    - Basic Ideas





    © 2003-2008 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster 4 hosted by Hostway