The past few weeks, I have been spending considerable time thinking about web advertising. Banner advertising is not a strong focus here at DevShed, but I'd like to open up discussion on a few issues. Before I get into a serious discussion, there is one point I must clarify. Al Gore did not invent the Internet. Then why, you may ask, did DevShed create a banner claiming that Al Gore invented the Internet? Humor and sarcasm. Click to see the banners we are running. For the record, we were referring to something Mr. Gore said in an interview with Wolf Blitzer in March: "During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet." For the whole story, see http://www.wired.com/news/news/politics/story/18390.html We've had a few emails today from concerned readers. Sorry if we seemed too serious about it. ;-)
Earlier this week, Rasmus Lerdorf, the original author of PHP, posted the following message to the PHP list in reply to a discussion about blocking banner ads.
Rasmus does make some good points. While I don't believe the banner is dead yet, webmasters must look for new perspectives to accomplish their advertising goals. I'm particularly interested in the concept of using advertising dollars to actually expand an audience. The idea challenges some of the tried-and-true media rules. Is the new web media different enough that these rules are obsolete? In traditional media, there is a constant battle to maintain a separation between advertising and editorial. With traditional products, this makes sense. What would happen if DevShed wrote a review praising a product in exchange for the product manufacturer buying banners on the review page? I've seen this happen, and I will refrain from naming names for now. Do the rules apply when the product is free, like PHP or Linux? If DevShed contributes to those projects directly, does it cross the line? Will we offend the Roxen and FreeBSD groups, or will they do things to make their products more enticing to advertiser support? Would that be a good thing? What Rasmus proposes can turn the whole advertising model backwards. Instead of the advertiser trying to get the attention of an audience, he helps create one. What do you think? Tasty Advertising I'm sick of the tasteless advertising on the web. Banners with half-naked women selling routers and switches don't work for me. I don't fall for the banners with the "error messages" on them. I want to hear your ideas for tasty (as opposed to tasteless) advertising on the web. I believe there are new models for advertising that haven't been discovered. Can advertisers add value to products and technologies? I'll probably use some of the better ideas to promote DevShed. Of course, I hope you'll use them on your sites, then share the results. Please take a minute to add your comments below.
blog comments powered by Disqus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|