BrainDump
  Home arrow BrainDump arrow Page 3 - Choosing an Open-Source Content Management System
Dev Shed Forums  
Administration  
AJAX  
Apache  
BrainDump  
DHTML  
Flash  
Java  
JavaScript  
Multimedia  
MySQL  
Oracle  
Perl  
PHP  
Practices  
Python  
Reviews  
Security  
Smartphone Development  
Style-Sheets  
Web Services  
XML  
Zend  
Zope  
Mobile Linux  
App Generation ROI  
IBM® developerWorks  
Forums Sitemap  
E-Commerce Hosting  
Linux Web Hosting  
Managed Hosting  
Small Business Hosting  
VPS Hosting  
Weekly Newsletter

 
Developer Updates  
Free Website Content 
 RSS  Articles
 RSS  Forums
 RSS  All Feeds
Write For Us Get Paid  
Request Media Kit
Contact Us  
Site Map  
Privacy Policy  
Support  
 USERNAME
 
 PASSWORD
 
 
  >>> SIGN UP!  
  Lost Password? 
Google.com  
BRAINDUMP

Choosing an Open-Source Content Management System
By: Bruce Coker
  • Search For More Articles!
  • Disclaimer
  • Author Terms
  • Rating: starstarstarstarstar / 12
    2008-12-15


    Table of Contents:
  • Choosing an Open-Source Content Management System
  • How to choose?
  • Which system?
  • More Systems

  • Rate this Article: Poor Best 
      ADD THIS ARTICLE TO:
      error-file:tidyout.log Del.ici.ous error-file:tidyout.log Digg
      error-file:tidyout.log Blink error-file:tidyout.log Simpy
      error-file:tidyout.log Google error-file:tidyout.log Spurl
      error-file:tidyout.log Y! MyWeb error-file:tidyout.log Furl
    Email Me Similar Content When Posted
    Add Developer Shed Article Feed To Your Site
    Email Article To Friend
    Print Version Of Article
    PDF Version Of Article

     
     
    ADVERTISEMENT


    Choosing an Open-Source Content Management System - Which system?
    ( Page 3 of 4 )

    Once you've considered the requirements of your CMS and drawn up a short list of required features, it's time to get down to the business of assessing various systems for their suitability. Given the large number of available options, this can be a long and time-consuming task, therefore it's worth considering using a tool such as the CMS Matrix, which allows you to compare the features of different systems side by side.

    This approach can be valuable, but with so many systems listed, you still need a place to start. To help with this, we've assessed the features, strengths and weaknesses of five of the most popular and widely-used open source CMS solutions.

    Joomla

    Joomla is a PHP-based GPL-licensed CMS with powerful features, designed for ease of use. It is primarily aimed at the small business market, but provides professional capabilities and is easily extensible.

    • Key features: Large range of built-in applications; comprehensive management tools; WYSIWYG content editing tools; free add-on modules for commerce, multi-language support and multi-site deployment.
    • Strengths: Easy to use, extend and customize; strong community support; excellent documentation; simple requirements (PHP, MySQL, Apache).
    • Weaknesses: Some security limitations; content categorization model can be restrictive; somewhat confusing structure.

    Official site: http://www.joomla.org/

    Exponent

    Despite its relative youth, the innovative, PHP-based Exponent CMS aspires to the level of a serious heavy-duty CMS. Its straightforward interface belies the powerful administration, security and content-creation tools that hide below the surface.

    • Key features: WYSIWYG content editing tools, comprehensive permissions and user-rights systems; workflow management; peer review and approval.
    • Strengths: Excellent interface; powerful security management tools; extensibility and theme tools; streamlined architecture and elegant code.
    • Weaknesses: Shortage of built-in applications; no commerce capabilities; limited functionality of some modules.

    Official site: http://www.exponentcms.org/

    Drupal

    Yet another PHP-based solution, Drupal has a strong following and is widely supported by site building companies due to its ease of implementation and maintenance. Highly recommended.

    • Key features: Straightforward web-based installer; support for standard web page development through a web interface; workflow and review tools; strong RSS support; built-in forum and commenting tools.
    • Strengths: Reliability; support network; quality of code; ease of customization; automatic updates.
    • Weaknesses: Limited documentation; limited out-of-the-box functionality - many modules are only available as add-ons; poor quality of built-in themes; steep learning curve for customization.

    Official site: http://drupal.org/



     
     
    >>> More BrainDump Articles          >>> More By Bruce Coker
     

       

    BRAINDUMP ARTICLES

    - Demystifying SELinux on Kernel 2.6
    - Yahoo and Microsoft Create Ad Partnership
    - The Advantages of Obscure Open Source Browse...
    - Dell Announces CSI-style Digital Forensics S...
    - Milepost GCC Speeds Open-Source Development
    - Learn These 10 Programming Languages
    - Tomcat Capacity Planning
    - Internal and External Performance Tuning wit...
    - Tomcat Benchmark Procedure
    - Benchmarking Tomcat Performance
    - Tomcat Performance Tuning
    - Wubi: Windows-based Ubuntu Installer
    - Configuring and Optimizing Your I/O Scheduler
    - Linux I/O Schedulers
    - Advising the Linux Kernel on File I/O





    © 2003-2009 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster 5 Hosted by Hostway
    For more Enterprise Application Development news, visit eWeek