Worried about greedy online merchants snooping around your harddrive when you visit their e-stores? Wondering how much personalinformation a site actually collects and stores about you? You might beinterested in P3P, an upcoming privacy standard that hopes to bring greatertransparency to the way personal information is used over the Web.
While the premise of P3P is certainly intriguing, the standard has nevertheless come in for its fair share of flak. Critics argue that P3P is a toothless tiger, often missing the forest for the trees, and is not likely to make any significant contribution to the privacy debate. Here's why:
Critics argue that policies which cannot be verified or enforced in any way are largely useless, and suggest that P3P should also address enforcement issues. Since this takes P3P into the legal arena (enforcement of privacy policies is closely tied to the laws prevailing in different legal jurisdictions), and introduces a whole new level of complexity, it's unlikely that this will happen any time soon.
3. By requiring users to define their privacy "comfort level", and using this definition as the decision criteria for accessing Web sites, critics argue that P3P makes the Web experience more complex. This complexity could end up hindering, rather than helping, new users.
Despite these and other criticisms, the W3C is moving forward with P3P, expecting it to evolve further in the future, growing and expanding into a platform that meets all user requirements in an efficient and simple manner.